However, Professor Jiang Wenwen said that "it has increased a lot". Also, what does "not significantly different than 0" mean? The only explanation is a typo. Again, triglycerides in the control group decreased by 0.2 ± 0.1 mmol/L, or more than 10%. But how could eating glucose lower triglycerides so much? Could it be that glucose can be a good medicine for controlling blood lipids? The only explanation is that the experimental data is wrong.
If I were a reviewer of this paper, I would definitely send it back and ask the authors to redo this part of the experiment. In fact, the authors of the paper are clearly self-aware. Throughout the paper, the word Triglycerides appears only in the copied paragraph and in the associated diagrams. It doesn't appear in Discussion or Abstract. This means that the authors of the whatsapp list paper believe that the data related to Triglycerides are questionable or unimportant, so they do not need to be discussed and do not need to be included in the abstract. They even just say "lower cholesterol" in the title, not "raise triglycerides." A clinical research paper on oats was just published in May of this year.
Its title is Serum Metabolomics Reveals Underlying Mechanisms of Cholesterol-Lowering Effects of Oat Consumption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Mildly Hypercholesterolemic Population Randomized controlled trial in a cholesterolemic population). The paper pointed out in the abstract that "oats can reduce total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, while triglyceride levels are unchanged." Of the dozens of abstracts I've read about oatmeal, none of them say "oats raise triglycerides." Most of the words that investors greet each other when they meet recently are: Did you sleep last night? Virtual currencies and global stock markets have entered a bear market.